The 15 Rules Of Web Disruption https://www.popularresistance.org/the-15-rules-of-web-disruption/ via PopResistance
By now you will have figured out what all the surveillance is about. It is not necessary to surveill every citizen in order to prevent crime or terrorism. Nor is it cost-effective, and we are all paying for this. So ask yourself this question. Do you think that is ALL they are doing?
The site “Coherent Madness: Effective Defense Against Covert Warfare: The Multiple Layers: Hidden Strategy of Social Control” is thoughtful with many valuable insights. I am sure you will find something relevant.
As often occurs there are problems with the links, but you can find the articles through the titles.
Coherent Madness: Effective Defense Against Covert Warfare: The Multiple Layers: Strategy of Social Control http://coherent-madness….-hidden-strategy-of.html
Have no idea how “…” added itself to the link – I didn’t type this – but it seems to prevent the link from working.
Another good article is “Four strategies of White Supremacy – Coherent Madness
Thanks to TIGSUKIRE “Musings of a TI” for pointing me to this site.
The first answer is in the methods they use, lies, ignoring law, bullying and manipulation.
The second answer is in whom they despise, vilify and exploit.
Small business people
and anyone who stands against their exploitation –
Those who uphold Rule of Law
Christians or moral people of any/no faith
People who complain
Supporters of democracy
Supporters of Free Speech
There appears to be an ideological war being waged against free Western democracies and the principles on which Western culture is based. All those mentioned in the title are parties to the assault. All their victims/prime targets are listed in the text.
All those listed in the title share the same objective. To turn society into two classes of people – predator and prey, exploiter and exploited, master and slave.
All targeted groups need to unite around the core principles of Rule of Law, the same law applied equally (blindly = without favour) and nobody “above the law”.
Democracy which involves not simply putting an X on a ballot paper, but those elected offering policies which the people want, and compelled to carry them out.
Social Justice – we all pay a huge proportion of our life long incomes in taxes, and those taxes should be retained within the country to maintain infra-structure and provide insurance support for the citizens, such as welfare and pensions; and our elected representatives are elected to represent ALL of us, not privileged interests who grease their palms, whether directly or indirectly. We also need transparency. No change should be foisted on the populace without public debate, examination and permission, or with the origin/originator of the change being concealed.
Always remember, the authorities like to have the last word. They don’t want any information in circulation, right down to conversations in pubs, (which coincidentally, are closing down at a surprising rate) that they haven’t had a chance to edit first.
As human beings as distinct from animals, we live in our minds, a fabricated ideational world. The authorities have sussed that in controlling thought they can control social reality. As George Orwell described so lucidly in “1984”.
Any information the authorities put out is heavily edited, from completely suppressed, to careful omissions, to altered to slant interpretation. Information they cannot delete is coloured by careful framing to create ambiguity, to deflect blame onto the victim, to create distraction. Remember someone saying ” this is a good day to bury bad news”.
You never get the whole story, just half a story, heavily biased.
The authorities in their activities do not subscribe to telling ” the truth, the WHOLE truth, and NOTHING BUT the truth”. A lie does not have to be spoken directly. A lie can be implied, suggested, acted out, which can often be more persuasive than a direct statement, because the listener fancies they have worked it out for themself. And a lie can be conveyed in remaining silent when a person hearing a falsehood, and knowing it to be a falsehood says nothing, allowing the lie to go unchallenged and accepted as fact.
THE MO GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS
1. Reveal nothing
2. Only allow information which supports position. Attempt to totally abolish any alternative view by any means available that you can get away with.
3. When revealing ANY information carefully edit so that there is no critical content. Maximise core message. Omit opposing viewpoint. If opposing viewpoint cannot be eliminated entirely use the oppositions weakest and most foolish argument as representative, then knock it down with mockery.
Avoid complete information containing all relevant facts.
4. Pull rank at every opportunity. Less, we are the authority, more our critics are rabble wasting everyone’s time.
5. Go on the offensive. Don’t wait for the people you are attacking to realise they are being attacked and then take defensive action. Attack them first, while they are completely unsuspecting. Before you attack any group engage in a major vilification campaign, so that when they are injured by your actions people feel they deserve it.
Examples of this are vilifying the unemployed when you caused their unemployment. Vilifying ill/disabled/dying people as imposters claiming welfare fraudulently. Vilify huge sections of the populace – the working class and lower middle class as “chavs” and by a strong media projection make sure everyone knows what a chav is – an ignorant underclass person, sexually immoral, takes drink and drugs and who doesn’t work. CHAV, what you now are if you are unemployed or an honest working person in a low-paid job.
Another example is constant reiteration of how much the elderly are costing, now cleverly twisted from pensions which are delayed wages, long term savings, and a lifetime of paying taxes, to welfare, now hyped as payments made to people who never contributed to society. Note, the people complaining about how much pensioners cost, are the same people who trashed their pensions (but not their own), and are destroying their savings through removal of interest and inflation.
The message being conveyed is that working and lower middle class people, the elderly, the unemployed, the sick and disabled are legitimate targets for attack, abuse and general social contempt. The bullies in society have been given the green light along with direction arrows. The attitude appears to be, all these people are surplus to requirements, so let’s get rid of them.
No, the authorities will never tell you the WHOLE story.
Of interest in this connection is “Chavs. The Demonisation of the Working Class” by Owen Jones
– is not surprising.
After all, they both pursue the same goals of money and power.
They are both in the same business of exploiting people, getting them to work for little or nothing, and taking their wealth.
Political powers can use political, legal and administrative tools otherwise out of reach of criminals.
An alliance between political powers and criminals give political powers access to criminal methods.
Both profit from the partnership. The whole is greater than its parts.
It is not rare for political power to be criminal.
Democracy and rule of law have been powerful antidotes to political/criminal mergence. Perhaps it is an indication that the political-criminal mergence has taken place that democracy and rule of law are under attack. Along with subversion and corruption of all our institutions.
Follow the money-trail. Money is being siphoned from our taxes, our wage packets, from funding of our institutions, our hiked charges, our higher rents, our bank balances, our pensions, our pockets. The robbery is wholesale and could only happen with political – criminal convergence.
That this is all happening together is not an accident.
Why would the authorities be so against the idea of conspiracy, unless they had a real conspiracy to hide?
So, they create straw dog conspiracies. Ideas so outrageous that only nuts would support them. Promote them everywhere. Call them conspiracies in capital letters, whereas fantasies would be a better word. Now no-one can suggest a credible rationale for what appears to be going on. By a sleight of hand they are now a conspiracy nut.
Just a con trick. Just a cover to camouflage the truth so they can hide the truth in plain sight.
Jesus said – By their deeds. Ye shall know them. We can look at the evidence, the facts, and reason back from them to the people whose MO fits the evidence.
. They are anti-Jew
. They are anti-Christian
. They are pro pagan and occult
. They are against news
. But they are for propaganda
. They are against education
. But they are for propaganda/programming in schools
. They are against higher education
. They suppress culture
. – except their own trash version
. Their idea of women is as baby factories and babies at their breasts
. And as sexual “entertainers”
. They hate blacks
. They class lesbians as sexual entertainment
. They are against the working class
. They are against Trade Unions
. They despise intellectuals
. They hold law in contempt
. They view themselves as above the law
. They manipulate and re-design the political and legal structures
. They despise democracy
. They conceal their objectives
. They lie about their objectives
. They promise Utopia
. – but only for their supporters
. They ignore national boundaries
. They make criminal alliances and protect and recruit criminals
. They mock their enemies
. They spread lies and smears about their enemies
. They commit crimes, then attach the blame to their enemies
. They experiment on non consenting human beings
. They generate strife
. They wage war then declare war afterwards
. They ally with barbarians
. They mock morality
. They destroy religion
. They want efficient transport links so they can travel fast
. They terrorise the law abiding populace
. They kidnap children
. They destroy the disabled, the physically and mentally ill and the old
. They excel in showcasing – in their shop window they put highly attractive public figures – beautiful actresses, handsome men, healthy athletes, prominent social personages like members of a Royal Family
. They provide mindless, extravagant mass entertainments for the populace and sneer at those who criticise the pointlessness or waste of money
. They suppress books
. They re- write history
. They hate publicity about what they are doing
. They suppress knowledge about their crimes
. They murder people
. They agitate for war
. – and accept no limitations
. They channel huge resources into war
. They despise peace
. They hate journalists
. But love propagandists
. – and inventors of fairy tales about what they want to see
. They control all media
. They steal people’s wealth
. They expect everyone, except themselves to work like dogs for a pittance
We have met these people before.
The last time they were called NAZIS
That the idea live and let live, don’t bother others and they won’t bother you, are wrong.
Being peaceful makes you a trouble magnet. Trouble makers don’t look for people who make trouble to annoy. They steer clear of dangerous, volatile, violent people and make a bee line for quiet, courteous people. Violence shows a consistent pattern in violent to non-violent, strong to weak. The violent and obnoxious seek out soft-targets. Victims are disproportionally women, children, the young, the elderly and disabled. But presenting as a civilised person can be interpreted as weakness. People who do not expect to be attacked are easy targets.
It seems we are no longer living in a civilised society, where the rules protect the law-abiding from the lawless. We are being left to fend for ourselves, where we cannot even rely on those institutions which were supposed to protect us. Children are bullied in school while teachers and administration turn a blind eye and assert there is no problem. Elderly and vulnerable disabled are treated callously in hospitals and care homes. The police scorn householders plagued by gangs. But they have the resources to hunt down the homeless and separate them from their last possessions. Bureaucracies make mistakes then punish their victims. Western civilisation seems to be dying to the jeers of those most active in tearing it down.
Perhaps in the absence of the will to keep building and maintaining a civilised society, the laws of nature fill the vacuum. The new rules are, be weak and become a victim. Those who aren’t able, willing and equipped to defend themselves, individually and collectively, will go to the wall. If you don’t hang together, you will hang separately.
Of the citizenry of the Western democracies, the Americans are best placed to protect themselves from the climate of anarchy. The Europeans are defenceless, as many of them have already discovered.
There is no justification for 6-figure salaries paid out of the public purse. In a time where it is not unusual for people’s work contracts to be torn up and invited to apply for their own jobs with less pay – in these days of austerity and we are all in it together – where there is a glut of unemployed graduates and redundant middle managers with years of experience – all public service 6-figure salary jobs could be filled for £50k.
There are occasions where a 6-figure salary is a just remuneration, but they are all in the private sector, in firms which produce actual worth which people are prepared to pay for.
In every other area of life the free market reduces wages due to the over-supply of workers capable of doing them. So how has this group of public sector employees managed to evade the natural effect of free market competition.
Evidently a different set of principles applies to them.
I suggest this possible explanation. Say the mysterious, hidden, “people in charge” want to implement reforms which are so detrimental that most people will be opposed. There are key positions in society which are instrumental in implementing change. Top managers in the NHS, leaders of local Councils, people in charge of major charities and so on. You can easily identify these crucial posts by finding out the salary of the person in position. If a person, not in the private business sector, is being paid a 6-figure salary out of public money, the chances are they are a puppet of the elite who have been rewarded with their over-remunerated post, in order to facilitate changes which are detrimental to the populace at large, but furthers the advantage of the elite.
The elite need tools to implement their policies. A standard person, receiving a fair remuneration for their job – say, £50k for a responsible position, will likely be committed to the job and the functions which that job is supposed to produce – whether ensuring that a particular hospital’s services are up to standard, or the local Council provides value for money in the provision of services. Giving bribes is illegal in Western nations. So the elite gets round this by making these crucial posts effective sinecures, in which they manage to appoint their puppets, who are prepared to subvert the purposes of the organisation that employs them, in return for a grossly inflated salary which they could not hope to gain any other way.
And the “establishment” returns their loyalty when on those occasions there is a scandal where lives have been lost and great harm done, the establishment pulls out all stops to ensure their puppets never suffer the consequences for their actions. Not only will they be protected, as often as not they get promoted.
I believe corruption is a much greater problem than has been recognised. To trace it, just follow the 6-figure salary markers in public office. Much could be done overnight to reduce corruption by abolishing all 6-figure salaries out of the public purse.
How do you force unwanted changes onto a society which is conservative and stable? Manufacture chaos. This then justifies using radical policies to contain the deliberately created problem, and while you are at it, you can implement the unacceptable changes that you want to bring about.