The 15 Rules Of Web Disruption https://www.popularresistance.org/the-15-rules-of-web-disruption/ via PopResistance
Workplace Power and Control Wheel http://abusergoestowork.com/workplace-power-and-control-wheel/ via @PatriciaGBarnes
What a lovely species we are.
Parental abuse, sibling abuse, wife batterers, bullying relatives, anti-social neighbours, school bullies, workplace mobbing, cyber-bullying, racism, classism, sexual abuse, age abuse, disabled abuse, stalking, institutional abuse in hospitals, from Social Workers, police, legal abuse, bullying religions, banks, large corporations, bureaucracies, con artists, organized crime, cults, white collar crime – this power and control wheel is a handy visual tool which illustrates the SAME methods employed by the out of control power freaks who are a plague on peaceful peoples lives. Never leave home without it.
Working the Gray Area http://wp.me/p1H7nZ-17 via @wordpressdotcom
Similar social exclusion and social sabotage tactics are gaslighting and all undermining acts chosen carefully for plausible deniability. A very underexplored area of human behaviour.
Many ancient people appeared to have a god for every occasion. Often more than one. It seems as if there was a deity for everything important in human life – birth, death, love, family, harvest, war, intelligence, culture, industry, joy, rage, grief, and so on. It is difficult to name anything important to human beings that has not had a deity, in some place, at some time.
The ancient Greeks also held that when the gods punished humans, usually for challenging them, the gods were adroit at shaping the punishment to the crime. Something else which always engaged the wrath of the gods were humans who revealed their secrets.
When we add to this the known tactic of aristocrats to hide their crimes in plain view, to bury their crimes with greater crimes, the punishment of Sisyphus becomes interesting.
How Sisyphus engaged the wrath of the gods is not made specific. He tried the gods patience. He challenged them once too often, for which his punishment was to roll a large boulder to the top of a hill and when it rolled to the bottom, roll it to the top again, forever. The very definition of wasted effort, futility, a life, in his case eternal, of being in a human hamster wheel, working forever at a pointless task, without pleasure, without reward. No aspiration, no achievement, hopes dashed forever.
So what had Sisyphus done, that the gods designed this punishment for him as most suitable?
Years ago I read a poem called “Futility”. It was written by the First World War poet, Wilfred Owen, in which he describes the body of a young soldier lying in the mud of the trenches . I took the poet’s point, but the title “Futility” made me think of women’s lot in life, grinding poverty, unending menial work, the total loss of the opportunity to reach their full human potential for no other reason than the shape of their reproductive organs. At least most men, most of the time have some chances and some joys in life. Futility seemed to me to describe women’s lives completely. I had a similar thought when I first read about the punishment of Sisyphus. Wasn’t it a description of women’s lives? Never having your own time, or opportunities to develop your talents, just a life of having your time wasted by other people. And if there is reincarnation, over and over again, without end.
I am old now and my parents are dead, so it gives me a perspective on their lives. My Dad was born in 1905, my mother a bit younger. My father when he went to sea as a sparks sent most of his income home to help support his mother’s family. He travelled the world, but apart from the ocean saw little of it as he could not afford to go ashore. My mother was Australian. A very intelligent woman from a line of intelligent women, but in those days unless you were quite high social class, women did not have careers, and respectable women often didn’t work as the pay for females was derisory. My mother’s antecedents were from Surrey, in England and she was an Anglophile. When the Second World War ended she arrived in England and telegrammed my father asking what she should do next.
They married and went back to Northern Ireland my fathers home, to live.
Ireland is not England and the North Irish are not English. My mother had hoped to escape her cultural backwater to a country rich in culture and history. Instead she found herself in another cultural backwater, in a tiny inconvenient cottage, under rain and overcast skies, a dismal diet lacking in fresh fruit, small minded neighbours and poverty.
And she had children, which is what married people did then, to make them even more poor, their lives even more squalid, my sister and myself.
As we grew up she took GCE O Levels and A Levels and at the same time my sister was at teacher training college, my mother was studying for her librarianship exams at Queens University. She later became Head Librarian at Ballymena Library, where she enjoyed her work and was well respected. After she retired she made several visits to her relatives in South Australia and I remember her annoyance when she told me they had only enquired after her family and had been dismissive of her library career. You see my Mum did not wear family blinkers. Her family were nothing to be proud of. Her achievement was her work.
Years later when I thought over my parents lives it was clear to me they would both have been happier if they had not had children. Or perhaps they should have settled in England instead. You see there are some parts of the world which are dead-end places to live if you are dependent on work, if you are working class and especially if you are a woman. And having been born and raised in Northern Ireland, I would have to say Northern Ireland is one of them. The critical factor is not religion as has been made out, but social class. You have a tiny middle class and a huge, well educated working class. If you are working class the only jobs you are likely to get are menial with subsistence pay.
I lived in Australia for a short time and understand why my mother was so desperate to leave. Australia has many good things, but respect for intellectuals was never one of them, especially a female intellectual. In England, as I have found since living here, my Mum could have exercised her mind to her hearts’s content among like-minded people, and found friendship and respect.
And what has this to do with Sisyphus? The thought struck me that according to the ancients all important parts of human experience had a god. I have read a lot of mythology and religion and wondered who the god of futility, wasted effort, destroyed hopes was. This is such a staple of human experience, a fact often alluded to in David’s Psalms, logically there should be one, as there is a god for everything else . I could not think of one and so I searched and came up with – nothing. This nearly ubiquitous experience of futility, wasted lives and hopes had no named deity.
And then I thought of Sisyphus and his punishment, the very definition of futility and wasted lives and wondered about Sisyphus’ offence against the gods. And how powers, earthly and unearthly employ the same tactics of concealment of their methods.
Did Sisyphus point to the empty pedestal at the centre of the pantheon and ask – who does that belong to?
Did Sisyphus discover that human life is futile? That human failure is not just something that happens but something which is caused to happen, by the powers that be, whoever they are. And Sisyphus’ punishment, a horrific example of futility was designed to make people turn away and NOT think about the issue.
Which explains the missing “god” as, if this common life experience of failure and frustrated aspirations is being manipulated , those manipulating it would make sure it wasn’t drawn to anyone’s attention.
Or perhaps the gods punished Sisyphus for wasting their time, by wasting his.
censorship on net, chemical attacks, crime, elderly ladies gang stalked, feminism, feminists gang stalked, Gang stalking exposed, people about to inherit gang stalked, slander, social sabotage, targeted individuals disappeared, vandalism
Expose Gang Stalking – Blog – Webs
Expose Gang Stalking – Blog – … One more thing, … I would like to remind the community that I am in grave danger for exposing this protocol.
Last year I came across an excellent site on gang stalking. It was a recent site but had recently gone “silent”, that is, despite being very active, activity had suddenly ceased. The way the site was set up there was no way to copy by re-blogging. Some sites like this I photocopy to keep a record, but in this particular case I didn’t. Gangstalkingexposed is one of the sites I have always recommended.
The site came up in conversation and I went to have another look. It wasn’t listed on Google. I tried Duckduckgo. No listing there either. I used other search engines and found it listed on Webcrawler and Dogpile. The listing above comes from Dogpile. However when I pressed the link a blank page came up with the message – this site is frozen.
So effectively the site gangstalkingexposed has vanished from public view – nearly as if it had never existed.
As I have no copy I will just have to recount the contents of the site as best I can, from memory. It was written by an elderly American lady whose mother had recently died. She said her mother had been a feminist and had been greatly distressed by being gang stalked. She said she herself had not been gang stalked and had difficulty understanding what her mother was experiencing. That changed when her mother died, and the gang stalkers turned their attention to her.
She worked as a volunteer for an animal charity, and up to the time the stalking started had enjoyed good relations with others in her community. She started to experience sabotage at work, harassment when driving, vandalism of her property, gaslighting from her tenants. She was astounded at the surround-sound meddling and harassment in every aspect of her life. She was also being subjected to chemical attacks. When she went out people would throw some kind of chemical dust over her.
She immediately researched gang stalking and set to obtaining maximum publicity for her situation. She found others experiencing the same and arranged a meeting, where she found a lot of other elderly ladies had been targeted, some made homeless. She gave out flyers with the words “Google gang stalking” written on. She was like a one-woman army.
First her site went silent. Now it seems it has disappeared from public view.
As her mother had recently passed away I presume she had just received some kind of inheritance. Stealing a person’s estate/inheritance is one of the reasons suggested why some people are targeted.
Stephen Lawrence brought the phrase “institutional racism” to the language. It perfectly described how prejudice is embedded into institutions such as the police. But “institutional sexism” and “institutional classism” are equally relevant.
“Institutional racism/sexism/classism also exposes that prejudice is not merely an aberration of one bigoted individual, but where it is maintained in an institution it can amount to policy. It is an active tool for keeping social “inferiors” in their place – where they can be abused with impunity, exploited and used as a dumping ground for everything bad in society.
Corruption and bias in the police is bad enough, but the effectiveness as a tool of repression is limited by the fact that most people in the oppressed groups are law-abiding and could go their entire lives without any interaction with the police.
But all children go to school.
Curiously, the security agencies who kept a file on Lennon due to his radical sympathies saw fit to keep a record of the lyrics of just one of his songs, and a relatively unknown one, at that . The lyrics of the song “Working Class Hero”. Now what did the security forces find interesting in this particular song?
“They hurt you at home and they hit you at school, They hate you if you’re clever and despise a fool”
In one line, Lennon describes a common experience from anyone belonging to a socially subordinated group, whether working class, coloured or female. The default position is you are treated as an idiot on the basis of your class, but if you should prove stronger and more intelligent that hostility ramps up to outright hatred. You are in a double bind. Whatever you do is wrong. And double binds drive people crazy.
Lennon then goes on to describe the modern “opium of the people”:-
“Keep you doped with religion, sex and T.V.”
Never more true than now.
Despite everything that is happening to them, people fall for the wall to wall propaganda, which is designed to create a false consciousness, and keep attention away from what is really happening.
“and you think you’re so clever and classless and free, but you’re still fucking peasants as far as I can see”
What Lennon describes is anything that anyone with their eyes open can see. But the last verse is truely sinister in its implications.
“There’s room at the top I’m telling you still, but first you must learn how to smile as you kill, If you want to live like the folks on the hill”
This can be unspun in any number of ways but this is my take. If a subordinate class person decides to sell-out to the ruling class, having adopted the mind-set of the rulers and abandoned all conscience and decency, they can enjoy the privileges of the ruling group in becoming their tool.
The only reason I can see for the security services taking an interest in Lennon’s song is because he spoke truth to power. What he was describing, from the institutional abuse of lower class children, the dumbing down of the culture, the high rewards to sell-outs to those in power was not only actually happening, but happening by design. John Lennon, in a simple song, had described the manipulations those in power use to stay in power, by undermining any potential competition before it can gain a foothold. And it starts with crushing children in school.
And Lennon enjoyed a rare accolade for a musician. Death by assassination.
John Winston Ono Lennon, 1940-1980
As a general rule, working class people are object/task oriented and middle class people are people- oriented. One source of class friction is the middle class tendency to like to have servants versus the working class aversion to being servants. Working class people are happy to be workers – a relationship to a job well done, which produces job satisfaction and self respect, as distinct to being a lackey, which does not involve obtaining any skills and destroys self respect.
The coal face of class friction is at its peak at the distinction between working class and lower middle class. Upper working class people are the skilled artisans. The nature of their work employs intelligence, creativity, accuracy, skill, focus and creates a highly self-sufficient mentality with a tendency to be intolerant of human interference – when you have got a job to do, people are pests. You just want to be left alone to get on with it.
Lower middle class people have the middle class focus of being people oriented rather than object oriented, but often their status relies totally on birth. They may be quite low in intelligence and have little ability nor the inclination to obtain hard skills. They are conscious of their low status within the middle class grouping, and also conscious they lack the intelligence to improve their standing. And they are very conscious of the social class below them – the working class, many of whom have higher technical ability, intelligence and drive. The last thing a lower middle class person of low ability with only his/her social class to claim “superiority” wants to see is a meritocratic society where people can advance themselves socially on the basis of merit. They know in such a system they would lose.
This is an essential class conflict. The upward aspiring, capable working class versus the mediocre lower middle class who stand to lose if working class people have the chance to succeed. Because the lower middle class cannot compete on fair terms, they resort to unfair methods, cheating and sabotage. The mind set that emerges is working class people are fair game if the dirty tricks used have the result of keeping working class people “in their place”. Both sexes are active in the process. A lower middle class woman, with little ability and unpleasant personality does not want to face competition for “her” men and the jobs she wants, with an intelligent working class woman, with a good personality, who has career ambitions. A popular method for taking the working class woman out of the competition is to slander her reputation. Respectability is prized by working class people. They know it is the foundation of social inclusion, and unlike higher social class groupings, they have to work for it, it is not granted for nothing. Unfortunately, a good reputation, hard worked for, is easily destroyed by lies from a higher social class person, and readily believed by those higher social classes. Why not? It is a cheap and easy way to eliminate competition. In the case of men whom society has granted a stronger immunity against personal attacks, sabotaging the mans work is the preferred method or rigging circumstances to make it appear he is a thief.
The different psychology of the working class and middle class leads to different choices in job occupations. Working class men often choose to become soldiers. This has the bonus of teaching useful skills, and caters to the tendency to deal with the problem by identifying who is the cause, then shooting them, as opposed to talking to them, which is the middle class way. (Joke). The lower middle class alternative is to join the police.
It is immediately obvious that police recruited largely from the ranks of the lower middle class, are likely to take a dim view that protecting working class people is part of their job, and with the – it’s OK to sabotage any working class person – especially one who shows they have the ability to succeed – of the lower middle class mind-set – the police more than any other occupation (apart from the security services) are optimally placed to abuse their special privileges to oppress working class people.
Which leads to the traditional enmity between the working class and the police.
There is also a political angle to the class divide. Working class people, experiencing direct social oppression (similar in a lot of ways to racism) tend to communism. Lower middle class people, obsessed with protecting their social position and “keeping the lower orders in their place ie, beneath them, tend to fascism.
Of course, in an intelligent, rational, civilised society, this squalid class struggle would never be allowed to happen. Many people of all classes of society are perfectly happy with the idea and the reality, of a fair society where anyone can improve their social position on the basis of merit. The only people against it are those who because of their intrinsic inferiority, often combined with an unjustified sense of superiority, recognise if open competition was permitted, they would lose.
Which leads us to the crucial class grouping with relevance to this particular conflict. The ruling class. In the absence of a meritocracy, the ruling class are not the best in society who have worked their way up to the highest echelon from every rank of society, to the top. The ruling class are almost entirely composed of people born to that status. They are conscious that there are very many people in the lower ranks of society who are more intelligent, more creative, more ambitious and hard working and skilled. This social class, also cannot take the competition. In common with the other social class in society, the lower middle class, because they know they cannot retain their position with fair competition, they deal with the situation by not allowing it. Some battles are won by not fighting them. Don’t allow competition to happen, and you cannot lose. At the same time you can exploit the unique privileges of your position to sabotage any underlings who are capable and socially ambitious – and you can take out a major bloc of competition in society by supporting the police in their sabotage of the working class.
Where the police assist in suppressing the working class, the security services are the tool the upper classes use to suppress everybody. To prevent competition from high talent, which inevitably occurs in a sophisticated society, competition is eliminated by recruiting, so far as it’s possible, the top people in every category. They can then be used to make sure that in no area of expertise there is anybody superior to the tools which the upper classes can use. The upper classes can then ensure it is their agenda alone, which is implemented in every walk of life. To ensure that no effective talent remains independent, various ruses can be used to magnify recruitment. The threat of terrorism justifies expansion. If terrorism didn’t exist, the ruling class would have to invent it. Perhaps they have. Londonistan is the creation of the British establishment. The Islamic culture hosts young males who are hyper-sensitive to insult and are volatile. Guatanamo is a running sore and ongoing recruiting sergeant. Turmoil in Middle-Eastern countries – war – induces migration into Europe. The security services claim they need more resources to watch the terrorists – a situation that our political class are largely responsible for manufacturing – but what they actually want all those resources for and indefinite expansion, is to watch and control their own populace.
Another set of ready made allies are criminals. You do not need to oppress people directly, just ensure that there are a large group of criminals allowed to run loose in society, subject to slap on the wrist penalties so long as they confine their attention to low status people. You can help the process along with social policies of deliberately housing criminals in working class areas.
The lower middle class tendency towards fascism likely arises out of the social circumstances, an attempt to protect class interests against a perceived threat.
Ruling class fascism is possibly historical. The feudal overlords in Europe prior to the decimation of the population by the Black Death, were characterised by the “we’re the Masters, you’re the slaves” mentality. When they discovered their land was worthless without people to work it, they had no choice but to part with some of their wealth, which they had previously completely cornered, to give labourers decent wages, and skilled people higher pay. The birth of the middle class who seized the opportunity to obtain education, develop skills, build and conserve more wealth, and politically obstruct the unaccountable despotism of the aristocrats. The general populace moved on to democracy, but the mind-set of the rulers never changed.
They could no longer lord it over their social subordinates. They replaced overt with covert methods and planned for the day they could seize back what they viewed was rightfully theirs. All the wealth and every talent in society in service of themselves.
autism, Balham Sorting and Delivery Office, defamation, dirty tricks, gang stalking, Helping national security, Irish land trespass law, lies, manipulation, mind games, slander, smears, social sabotage, spies
Also, slander, dirty tricks, smearing and framing.
The slanders directed at Targeted Individuals have a core standard menu of criminal/prostitute/homosexual/terrorist/paedophile, with anything else thrown in convenient to the situation (like in Ireland, spreading to the Republican community that someone is a British spy).
The beauty of lies as a weapon is that they cost nothing, and are infinitely versatile. You only have to identify the prejudices of the recipient and tailor your lie accordingly. And you can have even more fun spreading different, contradictory lies to different sets of people. Telling the Republicans in Ireland that someone is a British spy, while simultaneously telling the Loyalists that that same someone is IRA. As these groups don’t talk to each other, and the Target is an unimportant person anyway, the lies will not be uncovered. and of course it is the subject of the lies, not the perpetrator, who end up with all the resulting trouble.
The problem with lies, for the victim, is everybody else knows, but he/she doesn’t. They are the only one that is not spoken to. People who have been lied to about you, don’t come up to you and say – hey (insert name here) told me you are a spy/terrorist/prostitute/paedophile – let’s have it from the horses mouth -is that true/ what do you say? I guarantee it. No-one has ever come to me directly to question any story that had been told about me. What does happen, is people erring on the side of caution, in case the lies are true, quietly refuse acceptance for further educational studies and pitch your job application into the waste paper basket. You do not know what has happened so it does not occur to you to question the decision – not that you would get an answer if you did. Cheap and easy social sabotage. Your work, your study, your good name, wiped out in a few words.
Not everyone are complete idiots. The more worldly and intelligent, perhaps distrusting the source of the story will try to uncover by oblique methods the truth of the situation. I have had guvnors, most notably my employers at the Royal Mail where I worked for twenty years, do their own research. Shortly after I was first employed by them, initially in Bradford, Yorkshire, I was aware I had been discreetly “checked out” by their security division. And that was it. There was no evidence supporting the lies, so I was treated as a normal employee from then on.
When I moved to London, the same thing occurred. The guvnors checked the records, followed their own protocols, occasionally and unobtrusively kept an eye on me (Royal Mail offices are always completely covered with hidden security cameras) – end of subject. I deduce that the guvnors in London also figured out that I was a target of harassment. But I had neither help nor hindrance – just a normal work environment.
What eventually gives the game away is when people make inappropriate remarks, or engage you in strange conversations. Sometimes they are indirectly fishing for the truth. Sometimes playing James Bond and think they can trigger some giveaway reaction indicating guilt. All that ever happened was that I became baffled and wondered, what the hell is bothering them? A few examples. My first boss when I came to England for work, out of the blue, in a totally unrelated conversation, came out with the remark “black frilly knickers”. I stared at him in amazement. What brought that on? Thirty years later I found out about gang stalking methods and worked it out. I suppose he had been told I was a prostitute. He was a good boss. In the time worked I for him his behaviour plainly indicated that he didn’t believe it. I suppose the remark was a “tester” to see my reaction. In the same office another employee with whom I had got on quite well, a Latin American and a good Catholic, suddenly, out of the blue, told me he didn’t like lesbians. Well, OK. Thanks for your opinion. But why are you telling me? But after that he became aloof.
Back to the Royal Mail. The system in the London offices was a permanent guvnor with the second in command circulated in from other offices for a period of time, usually a few months. In this way the managers get to know how the Royal Mail works across its business. My work in London was an unusual designation (in Bradford I was a Postal Higher Grade, code desk), namely postman/cook. Our office was too small to economically support a Quadrant canteen, so the old fashioned method of splitting a postman’s duty in half, to allow time for one postman to do the shopping, and make the morning teas, and breakfast, then complete half a “walk” was the solution. So I would meet most postmen, and the temporary guvnors on a daily basis. I usually got on well with the temporary guvnors, for a time, then the strange conversations would start, and then the guvnors would avoid me.
One guvnor, who had a ten year old son with autism, I had many interesting conversations with on the subject of autism and the resultant problems. He also lent me several books on the subject. One day he came into the canteen and was very rattled. Angry in fact. He said he had been out walking with his son, holding hands. The child being autistic is nervous in public settings with other people present. And commented, as is often the case, autistic children are very beautiful. The guvnor said a passerby had given him a dirty look, the implication being he was a paedophile. Naturally he was enraged. This was a situational double bind. Of course he had to hold the child’s hand, otherwise he couldn’t have taken him out. For a father to be subject to such a clever, dirty but easy to deny it happened, slur is monstrous behaviour.
But a few weeks later he embarked on a conversation that when he was out with his son they had witnessed what were apparently a gay couple holding hands. This was followed by a rather over-the-top rant about gay people should not hold hands in public – and what did I think about it? Well, the main thing I thought was confusion. I had no opinion on the matter and don’t care, which was what I told him. I told him I had been waiting for a bus when a young heterosexual couple appeared to be engaging in mimic intercourse – and that I did find offensive – whoever does it. Holding hands does not bother me, especially coming from Ireland, where a man holding hands with his wife/girlfriend is viewed as a “poof”.
In retrospect I realise the poor guy, a good Catholic, was being played. They certainly knew how to press his buttons.
But conversations with another guvnor were even weirder. As before I got on with him quite well and had many conversations about everything. This guvnor was from Southern Ireland but had spent most of his adult working life in England. Then the strange conversations started. It is difficult to say in clear terms what he said, because he was intentionally oblique. But the gist of it was talking about bomb making and getting chemicals on your hands, and how he had a favourable reputation in this area. What!!!! Look, I just make the tea and scramble the eggs, what is that all about? This is England, you are Irish, you are talking about bomb making in a Royal Mail canteen which is equipped for surveillance/sound – what the hell! Even now I cannot deduce what that particular game was. I can deduce two alternatives . That he was an Irish republican sympathiser and the spies were telling him I was a British spy and he was trying to flush me out. Well, he was Irish, and loyal to his people, and a good socialist, but I didn’t read him as a Republican sympathiser. Or, he had been told I was a Republican sympathiser, and he was cooperating with the British authorities to get me to reveal my hand.
Clearly, neither of these guvnors had spoken to the permanent guvnor for he would have told them they were getting a load of horlicks.
As I have mentioned in a previous blog, it was clear that lies had been spread about me when I first got the job in London, and the men had rejected them. In fact, whatever they were told it was clear they viewed it as a big joke. I hated London, but enjoyed my work. But when the rent on our bedsit-converted-to-one-bed-flat by putting a wall down the middle, reached over £9,000 pa, the running costs of a house outside London, near enough wiping out either my husbands entire income, or mine, it was time to leave.
We moved back to Yorkshire and sadly my husband’s cancer returned and he died last year. I moved into a bedsit and the lies about me continue to be spread. This is a rural area, where the demographic is disproportionally elderly. I fit in here. I was raised in the countryside, and my normal dress fits with elderly, rural people. That is quiet, practical clothes, avoiding ostentation or sexiness. So it is difficult to make the lie stick that I am a prostitute. Telling people I am a lesbian – well, who would care these days. Besides lesbians aren’t trouble makers nor venues for trouble. There appear to be two lies that they have spread. That I am a terrorist and that I am a gypsy! For a start I am North Irish, Australian mother, anglicised in values and outlook due to her southern English ancestors, and born on the Loyalist side of the fence. And I don’t give a damn about any Irish politics. All Irish politics are on the extreme right wing of the political spectrum (including communists who might as well be fascists). Unlike the middle of the road English, where I fit. Most gypsies are southern Irish and supposedly Catholic. But I accept these are clever lies tailored to the community. English people can’t tell one Irish accent from another. Everyone is paranoid about terrorists thanks to the way our government have handled the situation. And gypsies are also a cause of fear, rightly or wrongly being suspected of engaging in crimes against settled country people (illegal gypsy encampments trashing house price values, Tony Martin, and so on). The population of Irish gypsies in England increased hugely when the Irish government passed a law making camping on land criminal trespass, which could include penalties such as confiscating caravans, and thousands of pounds worth of fines. (I have put up an e-petition asking the British government to challenge the legality of the Irish land trespass law before the EU. I don’t see how it can be legal for any signatory of the EU to pass legislation effectively evicting thousands of their citizens).
So to counter the lies that I am an Irish terrorist/gypsy – a combination I didn’t know exists, I am now crew cut and wear Ulster flag/Union Jack t-shirts. Not, I think, the fashion rules for those two categories.
I just noticed on my Wordpage stats page, under research terms, the following question. “Why would gypsies wear Union Jacks.”
Well, enquirer, I am sure you are a genuine member of the public who makes a point of touring gypsy encampments to pick up fashion tips, here is your answer.
My Union Jack t-shirts.
Me working on the code desk in Bradford, about 25 years ago.
BUYING QUALITY HOUSING ON THE CHEAP
A clandestine gang, operating countrywide, who target beautiful houses in good neighbourhoods, owned by hard working working or lower middle class people, who have worked their way up to buying such a house. (People who have wealth, mainly in their homes, but lack the protection that higher social class people brings).
The gang makes an offer to the people next door to sell up, then they move the neighbours from hell in. Overnight the value of the neighbouring property is trashed, so other members of the gang buy the property making an instant profit.
The anti-social neighbours will seem normal at first as otherwise savvy owners would sell up immediately so avoiding making a loss.
What made me think of this.
My parents owned a bungalow in a pleasant and desirable rural residential area. When my mother died two other bungalows also became available in the same street. Nearly immediately the best of these bungalows accepted an offer £20k lower than the already lowered asking price (due to slump in demand). Three other sellers including ourselves had little choice but to follow suit.
Coincidentally, within a year of our selling the house at a large markdown, the government loosened up borrowing, causing house prices to surge.
I wonder how many other people in the country (UK) have experienced something similar.
The four separate estate agents involved with the sales commented that in a slow housing market it was extraordinary for four houses to be sold in the same street in a matter of weeks.
We were suspicious at the time and since then I have tried to access house sales statistics on the net about the sale of these particular houses. Oddly, the sites tell me they have no information on any house sales on the streets requested.
Yes. I think there should be a House Scam Conspiracy.
BULLYING IN SCHOOLS IS SOCIAL ENGINEERING
When stupidity inadequately explains a situation then it becomes more likely that the situation is intentional. Then you look for the intention.
A few facts. Bullying occurs least in private schools and in grammar schools. Where the upper classes and upper middle class are educated. Also schools in general are amazingly controlled and supervised environments. Of all social environments, schools should be amongst the easiest to control. Yet bullying is at epidemic proportions.
Bullying follows a general pattern. Higher class on lower class. Male on female (note also the near abolition of single sex schools in the last 40 years). Stupid on intelligent. Yob on civilised.
In other words if you are a child, not of the ruling class/near ruling class group, and you are civilised, intelligent and relatively lower class you can expect a high likelihood of experiencing bullying aka child mobbing, personal, emotional, social, sexual, academic sabotage, intimidation, blackmail, and including the worst, physical and/or sexual attack, pimping of your private images over the internet, slander, up to GBH and murder. Why do the words of John Lennon’s song “Working Class Hero” ring in my ears at this point?
A few other facts. Before the grammar schools were annihilated starting in the 1960’s the intake from grammar schools to Ox/Cam had equalled, if not surpassed, entrants from private schools. In other words, under the grammar schools of the time even working and lower middle class children could access Ox/Cam alongside the children of the elite.
Despite all the balderdash spouted by the brainwashed about how the children who failed to get into grammar schools were destined to failure for life at age 11, that does not jibe with my own experience. I went to grammar school and received a fine academic education. Alongwith my classmates I went to University. And with few exceptions when we finished University we took office jobs – with the same status and pay that we would have had if we had left school at 16. My friends who went to girls secondary modern not only had a thorough grounding in office practice (typing, shorthand and book-keeping) so they were even better skilled office workers than the grammar school girls, but my friends there often became teachers. What is overlooked is when the excellent grammar schools were destroyed so were the excellent single sex secondary moderns.
So, bullying doesn’t have to happen. It is rare in private schools, and was rare/uncommon in the old grammar and secondary schools, which between them gave a high level of education to working and middle class children. Education that was so successful children from the lowest social classes were able to compete – on equal terms – with children from the highest social classes.
Now most of these are educated in comprehensives where very many children feel unsafe, and strangely the school authorities, who can apply micro-management control over what children have in their lunch boxes, and how they dress claim to be unable (in educational establishments for goodness sake) to maintain minimum standards of normal social behaviour.
And I haven’t even considered the growing war against home schooling.
School as social and educational sabotage – now there is a conspiracy theory with credibility.
COINTELPRO, con artists, corruption, covert war against civilians, crime, espionage, false flag, false light, feminists, gang stalking, hate crimes, homosexuals, infiltration, legal malpractice, lesbians, medical malpractice, perverting the course of justice, police corruption, slander, social sabotage, subversion, vigilante stalking
CRIMES THAT GANG STALKERS COMMIT
1. Slander ( as in criminal defamation, saying a woman is a prostitute when she isn’t, or a man is a pedophile when he isn’t. Or spreading the story that someone has a criminal record when they don’t – obviously making people unwilling to employ/house the people lied about, and making them the focus of community hatred).
2. Theft and vandalism of the Target’s/Target’s landlord’s/Target’s employer’s property.
3. Anti-social behaviour, in particular NOISE, against the terms of rental agreements, particularly overnight.
4 Medical malpractice – failure to give correct diagnosis in order to implement incorrect medical treatment, in order to cause harm to the patient .
7. Deliberately causing road accidents.
8. Retail – selling goods not fit for purpose, in particular selling deliberately contaminated food.
9. Child cruelty/abuse.
10. Agent provocateur – trying to induce people to commit crimes .
11. Animal cruelty. Torturing and killing pets.
12. Industrial/commercial espionage – particularly accessing private/confidential information on people and causing records to be lost/changed/substituted.
13 . Identity Theft.
14 . Fraud, including confidence tricks.
15. Interfering with the mail.
16. Perjury, and inducing people to commit perjury.
17. Obstructing the course of justice.
18 . Destroying/fabricating evidence. (Enabling criminals to escape justice, while criminalising the innocent).
19. Invasion of privacy.
20. Interfering with the citizen’s right to a family life.
21. Bullying school/workplace.
22. Welfare fraud.
23. Tax fraud.
24. Sheltering illegal immigrants from legal acton.
25. Recycling (as in police redistributing contraband they have confiscated).
26. Legal malpractice. For example a solicitor knowingly giving a paying client wrong advice, causing that client financial loss.
27. Sexual harassment.
31. Hate crimes