KEEPING INFORMANTS UNDER CONTROL
Police spy Mark Kennedy may have misled parliament over relationships http://gu.com/p/3e6v9/stw
Inquiry into unjust convictions caused by undercover operations to last longer than expected http://gu.com/p/4529x/stw
Eco infiltrator Mark Kennedy: The great betrayal | via @Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/8260116/Eco-infiltrator-Mark-Kennedy-The-great-betrayal.html
1.5 million bill for ONE spy’s sexual jaunts? How much of this “spying” is really necessary? And what is the total bill to the taxpayer of funding middle-class perverts sexual lives supposedly in the course of their employment?
Why would the authorities be so against the idea of conspiracy, unless they had a real conspiracy to hide?
So, they create straw dog conspiracies. Ideas so outrageous that only nuts would support them. Promote them everywhere. Call them conspiracies in capital letters, whereas fantasies would be a better word. Now no-one can suggest a credible rationale for what appears to be going on. By a sleight of hand they are now a conspiracy nut.
Just a con trick. Just a cover to camouflage the truth so they can hide the truth in plain sight.
Jesus said – By their deeds. Ye shall know them. We can look at the evidence, the facts, and reason back from them to the people whose MO fits the evidence.
. They are anti-Jew
. They are anti-Christian
. They are pro pagan and occult
. They are against news
. But they are for propaganda
. They are against education
. But they are for propaganda/programming in schools
. They are against higher education
. They suppress culture
. – except their own trash version
. Their idea of women is as baby factories and babies at their breasts
. And as sexual “entertainers”
. They hate blacks
. They class lesbians as sexual entertainment
. They are against the working class
. They are against Trade Unions
. They despise intellectuals
. They hold law in contempt
. They view themselves as above the law
. They manipulate and re-design the political and legal structures
. They despise democracy
. They conceal their objectives
. They lie about their objectives
. They promise Utopia
. – but only for their supporters
. They ignore national boundaries
. They make criminal alliances and protect and recruit criminals
. They mock their enemies
. They spread lies and smears about their enemies
. They commit crimes, then attach the blame to their enemies
. They experiment on non consenting human beings
. They generate strife
. They wage war then declare war afterwards
. They ally with barbarians
. They mock morality
. They destroy religion
. They want efficient transport links so they can travel fast
. They terrorise the law abiding populace
. They kidnap children
. They destroy the disabled, the physically and mentally ill and the old
. They excel in showcasing – in their shop window they put highly attractive public figures – beautiful actresses, handsome men, healthy athletes, prominent social personages like members of a Royal Family
. They provide mindless, extravagant mass entertainments for the populace and sneer at those who criticise the pointlessness or waste of money
. They suppress books
. They re- write history
. They hate publicity about what they are doing
. They suppress knowledge about their crimes
. They murder people
. They agitate for war
. – and accept no limitations
. They channel huge resources into war
. They despise peace
. They hate journalists
. But love propagandists
. – and inventors of fairy tales about what they want to see
. They control all media
. They steal people’s wealth
. They expect everyone, except themselves to work like dogs for a pittance
We have met these people before.
The last time they were called NAZIS
Last year, in July 2013 I gave a donation of £6,000 to Bradford Royal Infirmary.
Knowing how gang stalkers work, I ask myself this. After that donation was received, did someone go to the hospital and imply the money did not come from a legal source. Say something like – well, don’t worry, you are not in trouble. And then some time later come back and ” ask a favour”.
Last year I made similar donations to Harrogate Hospital, Northern Ireland Hospice and other charities. I have suspicions of all of them
In earlier blogs I suggested that gang stalking is not primarily about the Targeted Individual. The TI who is criminally slandered, is “the foot in the door” to access people to be recruited to the gang stalking cult. And that gang stalkers have a priority in infiltrating banks (so they can access confidential information), landlords (so that they can take over properties) and medical services (so that they can kill people?).
Now why would gang stalkers want to access people’s private banking information?
There have been increasing reports from “the land of the free” or is it, the free-for-all – (note to anarchists – you are too late, the government got there before you), that police are stopping citizens on an arbitrary basis and confiscating large sums of money that the person was legally holding. Now the question occurs to me, are these police stops completely random – in which case the police must be stopping hundreds of motorists before they hit the jack-pot or have the police been tipped off by a bank employee that a large withdrawal has just been made – that employee being a gang stalker recruit. Why else would gang stalkers infiltrate banks?
Just a thought.
To pervert is to introduce distortion into natural use.
To subvert, is to undermine the intention of an organisation and change it to something else. Even to the extent of taking a benign or useful purpose and changing to a harmful purpose, or just rendering the useful purpose, useless.
Examples of perversion would include voyeurism, of any human activity which is normally private, such as bodily eliminations and sexual behaviour.
A further example of perversion would be deliberate sabotage of a stable, heterosexual relationship, in order to isolate the female so that she can then be used for prostitution.
Subversion can be applied to any social organisation, such as personal, such as the family, or social structures, such as schools, medical services, legal, police, communications industries, businesses, political, banks, transport. In the case of family relationships, the family structure can be undermined by individuals being blackmailed or intimidated to betray their relatives, thus destroying family trust and inter-dependence. This was a favourite method in both communist Russia and China and Nazi Germany where children especially were coached to betray their relatives, even their parents.
Subversion in organisations are primarily criminal and/or espionage techniques, where an agent is placed, or more often, an employee is identified who can be blackmailed or intimidated to betray his employer/work colleagues/customers/the correct performance of his profession, for a purpose other than the firm’s intention. The ideal target is someone reasonably high in the hierarchy – such as a middle manager. The results of subversion will be the purpose of the organisation will become biased in favour of the interests of the subverter. One can expect that confidential records will no longer be confidential, will be used for criminal purposes, and records will be altered or lost to promote the subverters agenda. Communications will be interfered with, lost in transit or altered. Medical staff will withold diagnosis, give wrong diagnosis, withhold correct treatment or give harmful treatment . In some cases where withholding the correct treatment can result in death, causing death. The police may ignore crimes but prosecute citizens who complain of crimes being committed against them. Lawyers may fail to give correct advice and give wrong advice thus sabotaging their client’s interests. Tradesmen may give bad service, cause damage, leave jobs uncompleted and overcharge. Utilities may over-bill and refuse to deal with customer complaints. The end result is that institutions which have been corrupted in this way can no longer be trusted to perform the services which are expected of them.
All the above, and the examples are by no means complete, have been experienced by Targeted Individuals, which indicates that all the organisations which treat their customers in this way, have been infiltrated, subverted and cannot be trusted to provide the services required of them.
Gang stalking sites are written by Targets. So they represent the Target’s point of view. I only found out I had been the Target of gang stalking last year, so I had 35 years to look back on. What I noticed was that not only my life had been damaged but the lives of those associated with me. I thought I would make a list of the damage suffered by people in my vicinity, to show that it is not only Targets who have their lives disrupted. The following are the damages I know about. I suspect there has been a lot more damage that I don’t know about.
1. Single lady neighbour, frightened out of her home by weirdos hanging about. Sold house and moved away.
2. Elderly neighbour frightened in his own house, where he had lived all his life without trouble.
3. Family I baby sat for sold up and moved away after they started getting phone calls from IRA family.
4. My father out driving, pulled up by the police for no reason.
5. Parents sold house and moved after seeing someone with a gun hanging about in adjacent field.
6. Father harassed at part-time job.
7. (I don’t know if there is a connection here, but they were serious events and all occurred within a two year time frame, so I will include them). Friend suicides. (7-12)
8. Husband of a friend suicides, pushing that friend off the rails.
9. Brother of a friend suicides.
10. Landlord dies (so I have to move).
11. Friend and son die in car crash.
12. Friend survives a terrorist bombing were several people were killed and many others injured. Her closest friend died in the attack.
13. Rapists moved into flat below. I know that because they raped a girl of limited intelligence.
14. Solicitor I worked for infiltrated by gang stalkers. Two people immediately resign. The firm, against its better judgement defends a criminal that they know to be guilty, setting a dangerous predator free.
15. My boyfriend is swindled out of his savings – £40k (1980s)
Balham, South London
16. Noise pest moves into first house we stay in, in London. Causes extreme distress to his nearest neighbour (not us).
17. Someone posts drugs to the house and all tenants have their rooms turned over by the police – except us.
18. IRA man moves into the house, so everybody else moves out. Landlord upgrades the bed sits to flats, then loses his house.
19. Colleague at work is harassed out of the office.
20. My work equipment is continuously vandalised.
21. ? Next flat we move to is burnt out by a fire started upstairs. So we have to move again.
22. Noise pest moves into our next house. Two other residents move to get away from it.
23. ? Big fire in bins at back of house, causing distress to adjacent neighbour.
24. The new anti-social tenants keep breaking the security gate so people can get in at any time.
25. Anti-social tenants flood out (overflowing bath) neighbour below, twice. She moves to get away.
26. ? Fire in neighbouring room.
27. Landlord upgrades bedsits to flats, increasing rents and hiking utility charges. Loses his other business.
28. ? My husband’s employers wife dies. The employers driver and accountant dies. A local businessman friendly to my husband dies. A number of my husband’s friends die or decide to leave London. In one case it seems the support of his employer is taken away. And my husbands own support group are whittled away. My husband becomes a bit depressed at losing so many friends and colleagues.
Our London rent becomes unaffordable so we move to Yorkshire
29. A relative of my husband claims to be destitute, though there is no evidence of that in her lifestyle and persuades him to alter his Will. He changes his Will to give her half.
30. I am caring for my husband in his terminal illness. The medical staff are following protocols which suggest they think I am an abuser. They ignore obvious, serious symptoms, with the result his condition deteriorates faster
31. I move to cheaper accommodation, a house with 14 bed sits. All the previous tenants are moved out.
In this list as far as possible I have confined myself to collateral damage caused to other people, rather than listing harm that was directly caused to me. Some events I am not totally sure were caused by gang stalkers, but I have included them because they were extreme events and against the background of gang stalking, it looks unlikely they were coincidental. The clusters of suicides, deaths and people moving away seem to be part of the pattern, when you look at the results of those deaths and suicides.
The point I am trying to make is that gang stalking is a much larger problem than the damage inflicted on Targets lives. Anyone in the Targets vicinity can have their life disrupted/damaged too. I have listed what I know about, but I have many more suspicions. What I know may well be just the tip of the iceberg of the damage that had been done to innocent people who just happened to be in my vicinity.
Some people lost their houses, businesses and savings. Others were harassed by various methods, noise and flooding, weirdos hanging about, out of their homes and had to move. A woman may have been raped because rapists were deliberately housed below me. A criminal was let loose on the streets. Others were harassed out of their jobs. Many tenants had their lives made a misery by having noisy, anti-social, criminal tenants housed under the same roof. Landlords and employers were out of pocket due to ongoing vandalism and fires and rents and utility charges were increased affecting all the tenants. I wonder why there were so many fires. Was this to intimidate owners into cooperation. In short, I was not the only one damaged by the gang stalkers activities.
Some claim that gang stalking is a government backed operation. Going on my experience I can’t see how any of this defeats crime or contributes to National Security. The people in my vicinity appear to have been made the victims of criminals. The full extent of the crimes committed is unknown.
Gang stalking is not primarily about persecuting the Targeted Individual – although that has its uses. More importantly it is about infiltrating and controlling communities.
If the authorities did the job they were supposed to do – and have been empowered to do with a very broad license, terrorists would be identified, convicted and locked up or placed under total surveillance (and not by chocolate soldiers) and not allowed into the country in the first place. Ditto for paedophiles.
Allowing suspected terrorists to run around unharassed (you see how the real terrorists, do not get harassed) and known convicted paedophiles released back into the community with the total absence of 24/7 monitoring, a facility that apparently can only be arranged for gang stalking victims, creates a foundation of generalised unease in the populace.
So when someone arrives and claims that a particular individual is a terrorist/paedophile or a mythical monstrous hybrid of both – even though everyone in the community knows that person has been a postman for the last twenty years, ordinary members of the community dash to the rescue, put on their James Bond mask, mow the lawn for five minutes every twenty minutes, root through their wardrobe for something red, black, brown, whatever colour the target is wearing, and fondly imagine they are an important part of the war on terror/making their community safe for children. All laudable objectives, but …
I don’t know what school these people went to, probably a modern comprehensive (bring back the grammars and the secondary moderns) or what is in their tea via the water supply, but dumbing down seems to have been effective.
The sad thing about the huge farce which is gang stalking is not only the suffering of the Targeted Individuals, who are just ordinary people and do not deserve social persecution, is the huge number of other ordinary people equally decent and having goodwill who have had their lives (and sometimes livelihoods, homes, pensions and savings) stolen from them while they are subjected to the immoral, degrading and frankly insane, gang stalking procedures which they are required to carry out.
How to explain this. Feudal overlords playing games with the peasants? Look sheeple. Terrorist! Paedophile! Do this. Do that. Run this way. Go that way. Dress in red. Talk loudly about …
See how our rulers mock us, hold us in contempt, scorn our values of decency, good neighbourliness, love and protection of our community, use our strengths and virtue to entrap, threaten our families and loved ones, and plunder the proceeds of our honest work, while covering us with shame.
Picking the pockets of the peasants and having a laugh.