I had suspected for years that I was under surveillance and being stalked and it didn’t particularly bother me. But after my husband’s death the stalking went into high visibility mode.
Now what is the purpose of obvious stalking? It goes against common sense. Under-cover operatives monitoring criminals/terrorists do everything humanly possible to avoid detection by the people they are following. They are trying to catch the criminals red-handed or identify their gang members.
But the gang stalker controllers are playing a confidence trick. They know the target isn’t a criminal, so there is no law enforcement purpose in following them. The stalking is for the benefit of the recruits. It gives them something to do. It involves them in the process. Being obvious has a purpose in that it is an aggravation to the target, who gives a response, and that response is a conditioning reward for the stalkers. If the Target did not know they were there and gave no response, the gang stalkers would feel they were not achieving anything.
And it is a means to continuously harass and stress the Target.
Whether the person who intends to hi-jack your life and exploit you for their own purposes is an abusive spouse, a cult, a gang stalker recruiter, espionage, a pimp or trafficker, the MO is broadly the same. They will set out to destroy your relationships, sabotage your work and render you homeless.
When a pimp has targeted a woman for recruitment he will seek to separate her from her family, and spread the rumour she is already a prostitute. This causes the men in her vicinity to view her in that light, so when the pimp manages to get control of her and force her into prostituion the illusion has been created that that was the woman’s own choice.
An abusive spouse will often prevent the woman from contacting her family and not allow her to see her friends.
Cults also encourage or enforce separation from their families of their recruits and often encourage their recruits to sever all ties with their previous lives and try to ensure that the recruit only interacts with other cult members.
Gang stalker recruiters/espionage use the more subtle approach of requiring total secrecy, which has the effect of separating their recruits from their families, while for cover reasons they continue to interact.
The intended effect is to replace the previous relationships, which sheltered and supported the person, with a singular dominant-submissive relationship with the life hi-jacker. The life hi-jacker demands that the primary relationship in the targets life will be solely with him. From this foundation the predator proceeds to control every aspect of their victims life.
Those involved in espionage have further reasons for demolishing the relationships of those they intend to exploit. It is enormously difficult and hugely expensive in time and resources to use one of your own people to infiltrate a target group. Many inward looking exclusive groups would spot a state spy a mile off. Much easier to hi-jack a nearby local whose background everyone is aware of and use them to infiltrate. Your problem then becomes recruiting someone who does not wish to be recruited. Before you go anywhere near them to recruit you set to work to demolish their lives first. A person in a settled relationship, with a steady job and secure accommodation is not likely to want to give all that up for an unwanted life course that they might well view as reprehensible. An unsuspecting target, who has no enemies and no reason to believe that anyone would arbitrarily sabotage their personal life is very vulnerable. For instance, in the early stage of a promising relationship, spread a despicable lie about the new partner. That might be all that it takes to end a promising relationship. Discover which partner is more likely to stray and offer them the opportunity. Then that new third party is in a prime position to start attacking the original partners life. The techniques that can be used to arbitrarily destroy new or settled relationships for people who have no suspicion they are being attacked, when the attackers are not constrained by any limits of law, morality, culture or conscience, are many.
The point of destroying the relationship is to remove the anchor and safeguard that a good relationship provides, and to set the target loose so that they can potentially be placed into a relationship of the controllers choosing, ideally in or near the target group. Only when the target is placed will they then be recruited.
Intelligent adults are of course aware of the standard social dangers that we are likely to face. We all know about the existence of exploitive partners and try to avoid them. We know about con artists, pimps who groom their targets and cults. But in the normal course of our lives we don’t expect to be conscripted by covert methods and dirty tricks and have our lives arbitrarily trashed in the process of being recruited as agents of the state.
Time to wake up.
A Target Bait (target of gang stalkers) goes to live in a multiple residency in London. On the pretext that the Target is a criminal, with the landlords cooperation gang stalkers move into the house. They are anti-social and engaged in a number of criminal activities. The former residents are studied along with all the people at the Target Bait’s workplace. It is discovered that one of the work mates owns his own home – worth a fortune in London in an upcoming area – and is going to receive a substantial redundancy pay off. The stalkers systematically harass a single woman living at the Target Bait’s address until her living conditions become intolerable. The ideal boyfriend appears out of nowhere. Over the course of the relationship the woman is coached and recruited. Having been harassed out of her first accommodation her accommodation situation has become insecure. She is instructed to go after the Targets work colleague with the house and redundancy pay off. The work colleague thinks he has found his ideal woman. He engages in the affair of his life. He suspects nothing as the woman is a local. In time he loses both his house and redundancy money – the sum total of his life’s work.
Note. Neither the target bait, the target bait’s neighbour, nor the target bait’s work colleague were criminals.
Assisting national security, con tricks, Cults, domestic abuse, espionage, gagging, gang stalking, indoctrination, intimidation, protection rackets, slavery, targeted individuals, trafficking, vigilante stalking
What do the following have in common? Domestic abuse, trafficking, cults, confidence tricks, protection rackets, espionage recruitment, political indoctrination, gang stalking.
Control of the target/victim, and their total exploitation.
All the above are variations on the same theme – and that theme is slavery.
Not surprisingly, all the above use similar methods to obtain their objective.
1. Selection of the victim/target.
2. Isolation of the target. (As in nature, the predator separates their target from the protection of the group. It is easier to attack individuals on their own).
3. Silencing/gagging the target with threats of what will happen if they speak out.
4. Weakening target. By accumulating attrition over time or a severe traumatic attack/incident.
5. Deception of the target. The manipulation is more effective if the real agenda is concealed. So the target thinks one thing is happening when in fact something else is happening.
6. Control and indoctrination. The duped recruit must be mind-befuddled so that they embrace the false reality that has been inflicted on them, so disabling effective escape. In a sense the captive becomes in part their own captor.
7. Exploitation. Taking control of all the victims assets. Then working the victim to obtain more assets which will be handed over to their controller and/or being sent out to bring in more recruits.
8. When the victim has been sucked dry, discarding them. This can be problematic as by the time the victim has been completely fleeced and thoroughly abused they might finally admit to themselves what has happened and wish to retaliate. They might be overworked until they become ill. Subjected to such psychological mistreatment/games that they become insane (and so discrediting everything they say. Shayler?) They may be kept silent by threats to their family, threat of destitution/homelessness, a prison sentence based either on crimes they had been induced to commit or fabricated evidence, or incarceration in a mental institution. Failing that an accident can always be arranged, a fatal criminal attack or death by “natural causes”.
There is nothing new under the sun. Exploiters, like every other merchandisers, must repackage their procedures/con game so that the sheeple will fall for it.
Note. In the gang stalking scenario, it is the gang stalking recruits who are the targets. The Targeted Individuals are just the bait.
A year ago I had never heard of the term “gang stalking”. I found out when I enquired on Wiki about extraordinary behaviour I was subjected to by a relative, who had been acting out of character for the previous few years. Wiki told me the behaviour was gaslighting, and when I researched gaslighting I found gang stalking – which explained my experiences at University in the 1970’s (Organised gang stalking at University 20.1.2014); what my husband and I experienced when we lived in London (Gangstalked in Balham and Tooting 26.8.2013) and my experiences since my husband passed away this time last year when his cancer returned (Dear reader, give me your advice. Am I being framed? 3.12.2013).
A year on, where am I now? It has only been in the last year the stalking became overt. To be honest I don’t care about being stalked. But it is a pain in the neck having it brought to your attention at every corner, shop, wherever you are. I don’t want to even spend one second of my time thinking about those jerks. But as I have no choice in the matter I do my best to ignore them. Besides, since I have started wearing t-shirts with targeted-individuals (Army Veterans) written on, there seems to be fewer followers.
Logically the next step will be to come after my inheritance from my mother who died the year before my husband, and my savings from working in London. I suspect they will make out I am not me – in other words Identity Theft. My closest witnesses of who I am being deceased. But that’s the name of the game.
Bearing in mind that people who were recruited to gang stalking using me as bait, lost houses, businesses and life savings, along with their freedom, and for all I know their soul as well, I have two suggestions to make which I know you will find useful . Firstly have a good read about cults on the internet. And if someone approaches you and intimates they are working for our security services and they want you to help with surveillance of that terrorist/paedophile/drug dealer/blah blah blah, say no, and run like hell.
Cults have several vulnerabilities.
1. Their perceived illegitimacy.
2. People who are resistant to recruitment.
3. Their recruits can leave.
4. Outsiders can identify them and expose their methods.
5. They need to stay within the law as far as possible.
The limitations that apply to cults are broadly the same as the limitations con- artists operate under.
Criminal/political/mafia style gangs need not concern themselves with legitimacy as they make no secret of their criminal methods. They concentrate on recruiting those already sympathetic to their cause. Use intimidation/bribery/corruption on resources they need to recruit. And practice omertà with draconian penalties for whistleblowing. The threats are more likely to be threats to the victims family than actual brutality, as the former is more effective – and leaves no evidence.
Corruption in any of the law-enforcement services is inordinately difficult to deal with. Doing deals with serious criminals will have serious consequences if secrets are not kept. Don’t expect to survive betrayal or a clean death. The legal services have always practised their own in-house brand of omertà.
And these top rank criminals both inside the legal services and outside are major power and money grabbers who will do absolutely anything inside or outside the law to protect their positions and continuing activities.
All this we know, is common knowledge.
Now I suggest something speculative. What if corrupt elements in the legal services – and here I include the spy agencies – working hand-in-glove with major world-wide organised criminals, having at their disposal all legal knowledge and specialist crime knowledge on every type of serious crime, including how some very effective money-making cults operate, exploiting mind control techniques, decided as a side line to go after anybody in society with substantial resources. By substantial that could mean even the resources an ordinary working person could amass over a lifetimes work – the value of their house and savings. Obviously the resources of a middle class person would be even more substantial.
Cult methods would be used. The recruit would be subject to mind control after recruitment. Suddenly the limitations on cult recruitment, retaining recruits, maintaining secrecy, and staying within laws disappear.
The recruiter presents/perhaps is, a member of the security services. He has immediate legitimacy. He is allowed to lie to persuade his potential recruits to join. His recruits are silenced with confidentiality agreements/gagging orders/OSA -with heavy prison sentences for breaking. The recruits cannot leave. He can pursue his agenda using the full gamut of legal resources and every criminal method.
The perfect cult.
Cults, fair game, framing (crime, gang stalking, gang stalking cults, gaslighting, harassment, homophobia, noise harassment, organised crime, Perps crazy talk, racism, sexism, stalking, state sponsored persecution, vigilante stalking
I had EXTREME noise harassment for 11 years. The wax ear plugs from Boots are the best. Noise excluding headphones are relatively cheap. Earplugs, noise excluding headphones and music of your choice can blot out most anything. I had the problem with noise when I lived in a city. When I moved to a country town where the social norms were people making loud noise are very socially visible the problem virtually stopped.
A lot of the gang stalkers following you have been duped – they are naive – they do not understand what they are involved in. Their controllers want to keep it that way. When I am out I wear t-shirts with the following written on them. – targeted-individuals (Army Veterans); targets are bait; bait; gang stalking; vigilantes; cults; Fair Game – and so forth. Words which draw attention to what they are doing. I get few followers these days.
I have been persecuted for more than 30 years but I only found out the why and how last year. When I realised I was probably being set up for Identity Theft which would strip me of my savings and inheritance from my late parents and criminalise me in one go, I realised I had nothing to lose by making my situation as public as possible. After all – they attacked me for NO reason.
ATTACK DON’T DEFEND
Good Scientology advice from the inventors of Fair Game – the twin of gang stalking. As a gaslighting victim describing what is happening to you just provides seeming evidence that you are a fruitcake. Do not say when I left my flat someone came in and vandalised the window latch and the door to the wardrobe. Say instead an MO of gang stalkers is that they vandalise your landlord’s property so that it looks as if you have done it (makes out you are the kind of person who wrecks rental property), so that you lose your bond. Concentrate on what gang stalkers DO. They want attention on you after they have framed the situation. Turn the attention back on them.
PERPS ON GANG STALKING SITES
Perps who go onto gang stalking sites to hi-jack the conversation with crazy talk and inflammatory remarks. Treat it as an opportunity. Politely handle their remark and use it as an opportunity to make further relevant comments. The more you talk about what they don’t want you to talk about the less inclined they are to give you the opportunity. If you get stuck a mention of Scientology often ends the conversation. They also don’t like references to cults or vigilantes.
In terms of military strategy, I am a novice. So there must be many out there who will have better insight into this situation than myself. Perhaps such can point the way to a solution.
I believe the gang stalking situation to be this. A con trick, run on cult principles which locks two sets of people into conflict with each other, so that a third party, the Recruiters, can exploit both.
In my view, the Targets are all Bait. They are the means by which the gang stalkers are recruited. The Targets hate the stalkers because they are subject to wholesale harassment 24/7. The stalkers hate the Targets because they believe them to be despicable people because of the lies they have been told. While both groups are blinded by hatred, the Recruiters quietly empty their pockets.
I am Bait. I am trying to tell the gang stalkers they are being conned, but because of the lies told they are not going to listen .
A perp signature in comments is equivocation. And the equivocation is usually symmetrical suggesting a formula is being followed. The first half of the comment will propose one point of view. But the second half of the comment will propose the opposite. It is hard to argue with a person who does this. If you challenge one part of what they have said they will say you misunderstood them and fall back on the other side of the argument. You cannot pin them down.
A genuine person is trying to get their viewpoint across. They might ramble a bit but it will be clear what they are trying to say.
The Professional Liars feel most comfortable never expressing a viewpoint that they have to stick with.
It really is extraordinarily difficult to research the practices of “fair game” on the internet. The following two sites are the best I could find.
The roumormill news site gives a list of the persecution that Gerry Armstrong was subjected to – identical to the treatment of gang stalking targets.
The other identical feature was the unwillingness of any law enforcement to take action on behalf of the victim against those committing crimes against him. Gerry Armstrong, along with other losses, was rendered bankrupt by the campaign against him.
What has this to do with gang stalking, apart from identical techniques being practised by indoctrinated cult members? Only that the response of “authorities” to complaints of gang stalking activities is to claim that gang stalking does not exist, except in the imagination of the victims.
Numerous court cases are proof that “fair game” as a method exists. As these methods are identical to the methods used by gang stalkers, there is no justification for claiming that gang stalking is a delusion.
There are two sides to a delusion. One is to insist that something is there when it isn’t. The other is to insist that something isn’t there when it is.
It is arguable that it is the authorities denying the existence of gang stalking who are delusional. What is more likely is that they are simply dishonest, seeking to avoid personal connection to a problem which could destroy them personally if they attempted to tackle it. A very standard response.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/no frames/read/67344. Gerry Armstrong