betrayal, corruption, covert war, Cults, democracy, entrapment, false flag, fascism, gagging orders, gang stalking, lies, organised crime, organised stalking, police corruption, political police, political prisoners, slander, state corruption, subversion, totalitarianism, traitors, vigilantes
As the Professional Liars haven’t been kind enough to write to a The Times to display their good works to public view, we will just have to use a bit of logic to uncover the guilty party.
The Usual Subjects are as follows:
1. Organised crime
2. The State
3. A combination of 1 and 2
4. Somebody else
considering the techniques the gang stalkers use this option is not likely. Organised crime certainly can carry out huge criminal enterprises, but the methods gang stalkers use make Organised Crime unlikely. The duped recruits believe that a person on the side of law and order is recruiting them. Also the recruits are required to engage in vigilante behaviour. I do not see the authorities turning a blind eye to a huge money making scam carried out by people posing as police or National Security. Nor turning a blind eye to communities engaged in wholesale vigilante behaviour. So, I think it unlikely that Organised Criminals are the culprits.
By the State I include any arm of the State, whether police, National Security or any other body with similar powers. There are two likely scenarios which are not mutually exclusive. Firstly, it could have originated in corrupt police. Higher ranks would then have become involved both to provide cover and lend authenticity and also have the lions share of the take. The inter-relationship between police and intelligence is such that it is unlikely that intelligence would not want to become part of the action. Intelligence outranks police and the upper class people who gravitate to intelligence work are stereotypically greedy. Alternatively, it could have happened the other way round. Either way there would be enough corruption in both bodies to form common ground. Working together also enables them to cover all bases.
a Combination of Organised Crime and the State
this is a gobsmacking prospect. In the West we are not accustomed to viewing the State and major criminals as being in cahoots. However, this is commonplace in 3rd world countries . In Russia it has long been assumed that the government and major criminals are the same people. And in Europe there is a long tradition of criminal corruption in the governments of both Italy and France. Globalisation also means globalisation of crime. Major criminals, once safely confined behind national borders can now access the West bringing their criminal expertise with them .
Both police and intelligence spend their working day either with major criminals or studying their methods. Gamekeeper turned poacher is an occupational hazard. Why not? It is an open question and difficult to credibly attempt an answer in the abstract. I suspect not. Principally it is a matter of control. Both police and intelligence are happy to use criminals and employ criminal methods themselves – but they are doing this for their own aggrandisement. Sharing with criminals would dilute their control. Although two other possibilities occur . An internal coup either by major criminals or a foreign political power?
Partly answered in the previous section. The Illuminati? The New World Order? A foreign political power or an opportunistic major criminal? Stranger things have happened. The world did not expect Genghis Khan or Hitler. But I cannot think of any secret take over on such a huge scale as this appears to be.
It appears to be an unholy alliance between the police and National Security who are criminally subverting their authority to engage in freelance opportunistic crime hiding under the umbrella of their authority.
At whose instigation it would be nice to know. But what is plain is the process is being used to discard marginal people and independent women into a sub-human category. At the same time as stripping middle class people of their property, businesses and finances while turning them effectively into slaves.
Whoever is doing this does not believe in human rights, rule of law, democracy, or evidently any kind of morality. To say the least, they are not Christian.
Equally clearly, they are interested in obtaining total power over people both individually and collectively, with the theme of micro-managing the lives of those under their control. All in pursuit of wealth and power, and with the strong intention of keeping it.
Now if our governments are behind this, they have adopted a criminal agenda.
Loyalty to a people, or loyalty to a country does not mean necessarily loyalty to a government, not if that government are clearly criminal and immoral by their actions, and act in such a way as to indicate that they are the enemies of the cultural and political values of the people they govern. Such as to subvert a democracy into a totalitarian state with rulers accountable to nobody and considering themselves to be above the law.
Rulers can also be traitors.