Maintaining the status quo is not easy. It doesn’t just happen by itself, it has to be made to happen.
The people at the top have it made and they want to keep it that way. The people in the middle are sufficiently rewarded and included that they have a stake in society, and will follow where the top people lead in order to continue getting the goodies and possibly some more if they grovel enough.
The problem lies with the have-nots, at the bottom of the heap. The problem is, is that no-one wants to live in squalor, working their ass off for peanuts. Everyone in that situation, and they are a significant number, want to better themselves. Poor people are a problem.
That is the view from the top. Of course, poor people don’t see it that way. Poor people think they have a problem, and if they only get an education, or go to where the work is, then they can work their way out of poverty and have a decent life. Poor people may well be apolitical, politically apathetic, conservatives with a small c, and think no-one is interested in them. They are wrong. As far as the guardians of the status quo are concerned, poor people, especially those who want to better themselves and have the ability to do so, are a threat. They con’t have to be consciously radical in order to be a threat. They are a threat to the status quo in simply wanting a better life.
The threat they represent is this. The people at the top can’t take competition. They deal with this by not allowing it to happen – for them. The middle classes are generally content and most do not aspire to the top. But if the people on the bottom rung of society try to climb that ladder, they start competing for middle class positions, displacing less able, and less ambitious middle class people. This not only makes middle class people discontent, but introduces real intelligence, real talent into a position in society where these qualities can have some effect. The middle classes have been domesticated into servitude to the ruling class. The working class are not.
The solution is social exclusion. But how do you keep a good man (or woman) down? You cannot give them credit where credit is due, because then you cannot justify excluding them from the good jobs and promotions. Their character, intelligence, qualifications and work record speaks for itself. If you played fair they could win. So you don’t play fair. You cheat.
Nobody wants to have anything to do with criminals. Obviously. No-one wants to be a victim of crime. Spread the slander that a given person is a criminal, and they are socially finished. Blatantly or discreetly they will be shunned. Better still, spread the slander to everyone but ensure that the target doesn’t hear about it and they will never figure out why they can’t get work and decent people refuse to interact with them.
But good people don’t become criminals just because someone as labelled them as one. They continue to lead responsible, law-abiding lives, doing honest work, and engaging in constructive activities. There is only so much the slanderers can do to make it seem as if a target is a criminal. So they take it a step further. They try and induce the target to commit crimes by placing crime opportunities in their path. If all else fails, and the target is stubbornly honest, then they are simply framed. If the target should get wise to the process, then they are labelled crazy and locked up in a mental institution. Problem solved.
Surely not, you say. Surely society doesn’t work like that. Well, it does, if you are working class, black, and especially a working class or black woman. No-one in society wants you to better yourself, not if it means displacing them from a good job. If you are middle class you don’t view working class people as the same and equal to yourself, and you don’t want to consider the possibility that they might be. What do you know of working class people? Only what you see presented on the media, that they are coarse people who dress eccentrically with bad haircuts, prone to crime and sexual immorality, living on welfare, and if the women aren’t prostitutes they are sluts. Not at all like yourself. So if someone in authority tells you that that person is a criminal, of course you believe them. Because you also have a stake in the status quo. You are not a horrible person. You believe you would be fair to a person of any social class, but (sigh of relief) you don’t have to with that particular person because that person is a criminal.
My issue though is not with people being conned and conning themselves. It is with what is supposed to be responsible sectors of society deliberately manufacturing crime, where there wasn’t any. And doing it out of a deliberate policy of keeping sections of society so economically depressed that if they work at all it will be exploitation and without prospects. How do you keep people working without incentives? By giving them no other choice. And as soon as they lift their heads up you have labelled them as criminals so no-one will listen to their reasonable complaints.
No, this is not my paranoid imaginings. There is a rather good book “Blacklisted” by D Smith and P Chamberlain, which recounts how a private and secretive body working for employers conspired to prevent highly skilled men from obtaining work over the course of decades, by placing them on a blacklist. The government denied that blacklisting occurred. Most of the men didn’t know they were on a blacklist and had no way of checking the information held about them which was often incorrect. The nature of the information strongly suggested that the source of the information came from the police and security services by way of their snooping activities into peoples private lives, and totally legal activities. Trade Union health representatives are not by any definition criminal nor subversives. Why should a secretive body determine who gets work and who is denied work? And why should that be the business of the state? Note, it was the best people who were being excluded from work. Their qualifications and skills were not in question. The only way to exclude them was by smearing their reputations, and that was sufficient to deny them employment.
These are the methods the instruments of the state use to determine who gets work and who doesn’t and the kind of work people get. If you are working class, the status quo is determined that you will not get anywhere regardless of your intelligence, qualifications, ability and work ethic. And to justify this you are made to look criminal.
There are two sides to the coin of the authorities manufacturing crime to serve a social engineering agenda. If they cannot make you commit a crime, they can set you up to become a victim of crime. What is likely to happen to a woman falsely labelled a prostitute (with the additional vulnerability that she doesn’t know she has been slandered in this way) or a man falsely labelled as a paedophile?
Manufacturing crime by creating crime opportunities and pushing the target towards them.
Manufacturing crime by setting the target up for attack with extreme slanders.
A third way of manufacturing crime is by designing provoking situations, such as long-term noise and other harassments from neighbours. Nuisance neighbours being deliberately placed adjacent to the target. When the target complains about the noise they are ignored, but if they, after a long period of extreme provocation retaliate in any way, complaints about them will be upheld, sometimes giving them a criminal record.
Provocation can be arranged in other settings too.
Crimes may also be committed in the target’s vicinity and then the situation arranged to make it seem the target was responsible.
Obviously none of this is accidental. It is deliberate. It is planned and executed by people who are shielded from public view and any consequences – the police and security services. It should not be the business of any instrument of government to manufacture crime, and certainly not to criminalise innocent people.
The government denies that gang stalking exists. They also denied that blacklisting exists.
But if you think that you are higher than working class and so exempt from these shenanigans, think again. What do you think happens after that policeman/member of the security services taps you on the shoulder and gives you a friendly word in your ear asking for your co-operation to assist the authorities in dealing with that dangerous criminal, who isn’t. That bogus investigation that never ends, because the target isn’t a criminal and there is no criminal activity to uncover. Do you think once the police/security services have stepped into your life on false pretences that they will just go away again? Of course not. Once you have opened the door to them and agreed to cooperate, you have got them in your life forever. They will never go away.
Remember the criminal expertise of the police and spies. They know everything about applied psychology of intimidation, confusion, eliciting feelings of guilt, even in the innocent, generating fear, undermining self-assurance, manipulation, the whole mind control game. They have been educated by the best criminals, con artists, psychological abusers, people who manage cults, as well as the knowledge gleaned from criminal governments. On top of which they have the best brains in the country at their disposal, top psychologists, criminologists, sociologists, and medical people.
The person lied about is only the bait. You are the target. Because as gangsters, terrorists, con men and people who run cults know, the money is with the middle classes.
So what comes after you have agreed to cooperate with the authorities focused on that dangerous criminal who isn’t? They take over your life. Your time, energy and resources are now at their disposal. They alternate between the friendly, helpful face, concerned with your welfare, and the we are all in it together camaraderis of the crime fighters, with fear, threat, and intimidation as the alternate. You thought you were not a criminal? Think again. Our millions of laws are so all embracing, so trivial, extending into every area aof life, that anyone the authorities wish to treat as a criminal, is a criminal. Have you obeyed every tiny law, even the ones you don’t know about? Have all your tax returns been absolutely accurate? Have you ever exaggerated an insurance claim? Have you ever taken scrap paper home from the office for your toddler to scribble on? That is theft. Did you tell the taxman about the money you gave the baby sitter? Has your teenager ever had a puff of dope? Because even if your life is flawless, and few peoples lives are due to our all-encompassing laws, you have relatives and loved ones, and perhaps they did something they shouldn’t have and the authorities know about it. Have relatives, get blackmailed. You will do anything to protect your loved ones from the disproportionate effects of small legal infractions, especially those committed by the young whose lives will be blighted. And the same body which is prepared to blackmail you is also adept at encouraging people who are not criminals to commit criminal acts.
Setting up young people is easy. Young people socialise more freely than any other section of society. Perhaps your perfectly law-abiding and careful son or daughter was in a group where a member of the group without any forewarning, committed a crime. Now you child was at the scene and implicated, even though they had no idea what that person they did not know very well had planned to do.
Only the elite’s youngsters can get away with taking drugs without imprisonment, and the elite who can commit gargantuan crimes while the police look the other way. You are not elite.
The police not only know how to manufacture guilt, they manipulate other feelings too. They know how to pulle peoples strings. They have already pulled your strings manipulating your fear and loathing of criminals and other unsavoury characters, by presenting you with a straw dog to focus your attention. Then they set to work to generate insecurity, fear, dependence on them as protectors in the uncertain environment they have manufactured, and your own guilt and remorse at past failures. The more the authorities know about you the more ammunition they have to use against you. You find yourself on the defensive against the authorities, but there is no defence. You are not a criminal. Nor are your relatives criminals. But our laws are so pervasive, so trivial, and we have all been young and made mistakes. The greatest weaknes for all of us is youth. Innocence, ignorance and naivety are easy to exploit. The people who manipulate crimes can make anyone they wish appear guilty.
It is not only the working class who are falsely framed as criminals by the authorities. It is potentially everyone who is not a member of the protected elite. Using the police and security services in this way enables those who are in power to invade and control the lives of potentially everyone else, to force them into the role of unpaid slaves of the state, and over time leech from them all their resources.
I am a Targeted Individual. I was stalked by strangers when a student at university and was forced to move from another town as a result of stalking by strangers who attempted to break into my house.
Not being a criminal I have no criminal associates, only ordinary, honest, working people. Amonmg these, friends have been swindled out of their life’s savings, and friends and landlords lost their homes, and small business people lost their businesses. Businesses where I was a customer followed a pattern of overnight going from providing a good service at a reasonable price for a poor service at the highest price. Staff were cut, and both workload and hours increased. Businesses frequently changed ownership or went bankrupt. Landlords were afflicted with problem tenants including putting prostitutes into the house, and ongoing vandalism, including constant breaking of locks and security gates, flooding from overflowing baths and events of arson. In one case a house was burnt down and completely renovated with insurance money. The properties were extended where possible and upgraded into luxury flats, usually just before the landlord lost ownership.
Gang stalkers using their targets as bait, who most often don’t even know they are targets, as there is no reason a person who has never committed a crime would suspect that the police are telling everyone that she is a criminal. Using the lies spread about the target, gang stalkers infiltrate every organisation that the target has dealings with banks, medical services, solicitors, universities, places of leisure , charities, etc. Once they infiltrate they control through the process of manipulation, intimidation, blackmail and deception of the employees. If they cannot find a crime that the employee has carried out they will encourage that employee to commit a crime. Much the same as gangsters require their new recruits to commit a crime so that the leaders will have control over them. Once the recruit has committed a crime, their controller can force them to do anything else that they want done.
Many of these positions give the gang stalkers access to private information, financial, medical and legal on thousands of people. Records that can be conveniently lost or altered.
One charity I worked for, the young manageress, and Indian lady, was beset with problems with problem customers, voluntees who stole, unreasonable demands from higher management, and told me in great bewilderment that her family were treating her with suspicion, and finally she was raped by an acquaintance she had no reason to suspect.
This is gang stalking. The police and security services are involved. According to the government, gang stalking does not exist.