What more evidence do we need that the government has become completely divorced from reality. What work could this young man do and what employer would employ him?
From daily The Morning Star in Britain:
France: National Assembly discusses new snoopers’ charter
Tuesday 14th April 2015
FRENCH spies could be free to bug and track anybody they feel like observing inside the country under a Bill which was debated in parliament yesterday.
Although web hosting companies, which could be required to monitor their clients, have raised concerns and civil liberties advocates have warned that the Bill lacks adequate privacy protections, their objections have been dismissed by the government.
More than three months after 17 people were killed in attacks by three Islamist gunmen in Paris, the government is seeking measures that will allow spy agencies to tap phones and emails at will, without seeking permission from a judge.
Surveillance staff will also be able to bug…
View original post 308 more words
By KATE MURPHY
IMAGINE a world suddenly devoid of doors. None in your home, on dressing rooms, on the entrance to the local pub or even on restroom stalls at concert halls. The controlling authorities say if you aren’t doing anything wrong, then you shouldn’t mind.
Well, that’s essentially the state of affairs on the Internet. There is no privacy. If those creepy targeted ads on Google hadn’t tipped you off, then surely Edward J. Snowden’s revelations, or, more recently, Jennifer Lawrence’s nude selfies, made your vulnerability to cybersnooping abundantly clear.
You need only read George Orwell’s “1984” or watch the film “Minority Report” to understand how surveillance is incompatible with a free society. And increasingly, people are coming to understand how their online data might be used against them. You might not get a job, a loan or a date because of an indiscreet tweet or if…
View original post 366 more words
Revealed: How the Government studied the paranormal for use in war on terror
Here I am proposing another speculative theory about the purpose and methods of gang stalking.
Consider this situation. Supposing the “authorities” are behind gang stalking, that is the police and security services, and they wish to monitor and personally and socially “neutralise” a category of people they have no justification in monitoring because those people are not criminals, not mentally unstable and no threat to the public, how could they set about this without drawing attention to what they are doing? That is harassing law abiding members of the public without justification?
The first question naturally is, who would such people be?
This is a speculative theory which is a minority view among Targeted Individuals.
There used to be a page on the UK site targeted-individuals, the site put up by UK Gulf War Veterans, which referred to the historical practice of rulers to employ, presumably also seek out and…
View original post 365 more words
Trade union bill: add your name against it – News – PCS
‘Conned’: a German view of Ireland
Blaming Government Surveillance on the Government Ignores the Plutocrats Behind the Curtain
Government does the bidding of economic powers in a society.